STANDARDS ACHIEVED BY PUPILS
Standards achieved in areas of learning, subjects and courses
Standards are well above
average overall. They are above
average in Years 7 to 9, and well above
average by Year 11. Achievement
is very good for all pupils across Years 7 to 11,
Main strengths and
weaknesses
-
Pupils’ progress
from Year 7 to GCSE examinations in
Year 11 is amongst the best nationally.
-
An excellent
emphasis on inclusion supports pupils with special educational
needs to achieve very well.
-
Higher attainers do
not always make as much progress in Years 7 to
9 as they do in similar schools.
Commentary
Key Stage 3
Standards in national tests
at the end of Year 9 average point scores in
2003 (There are no comparative data for 2004)
Standards in: |
School results |
National results |
English |
34.1 (35.5) |
33.4 (33.3) |
Mathematics |
38.7 (37.3) |
35.4 (34.7) |
Science |
36 (34) |
33.6 (33.3) |
There were 199 pupils in the year group. Figures in brackets
are for the previous year
Standards on entry to the school are average overall. Although
pupils reach just above average levels in tests at the end of Year
6, when inspectors talked to them, watched them in lessons and
looked at their work, they found that they were not sustaining
these standards in new situations. When talking, reading, or writing
pupils showed average skills, though they do improve significantly
by Year 9. Skills in ICT vary considerably in Year 7 depending
on the resources and expertise available in primary schools.
2. Achievement through Years 7 to 9 is good for both boys and
girls, so that by the end of Year
9 standards are above average overall. Standards in national
tests at the end of Year 9 have fluctuated considerably. In 2003
(the latest year for which comparisons are available) results were
well above average nationally, and similar to those achieved by
pupils in other schools who had reached similar levels by the end
of Year 6.
3. Results in English were
above the
national average, but below the standards in similar schools,
as they had been in 2002. This was because the proportion of
pupils reaching the higher levels was well below that achieved
in similar schools, In the 2004 tests the English results improved
significantly, and exceeded teachers’ expectations.
4. In mathematics results were well above the national average,
and above the standards in similar schools. They had been well
below the standards in similar schools in the previous year. Standards
were maintained in 2004.
5. In science results were well above the national average, and
matched the standards in similar schools, having been very low
in comparison in 2002. Standards were maintained in 2004, though
the percentage of pupils reaching the higher levels was smaller
than expected.
6. Work seen during the inspection showed that standards are
above average overall. They are well above average in drama, music,
and in history, where the teaching and assessment |